Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:17 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:

I actually think we only should have a Provide for *-static, so that people who want to use static libs now and in the future (when there may be a shared version) , can guarantee they will get the static version by BuildRequiring the -static, since very few packages will ever have a real *-static-noshared, having a virtual provides for this feels wrong.

The problem is two-fold:
> ...

Thanks, I think I finally have a grasp of all the motivations here, and agree the new draft is the best way forward.

-- Rex

p.s.  static libraries suck

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux