Fedora Packaging

• Thread Index

• Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Duplication of documentation in subpackages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Package naming help, please
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Package naming help, please
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: Package naming help, please
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Package naming help, please
  • From: Till Maas
• Package naming help, please
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: alsa-plugins-a52 in Fedora 8?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• alsa-plugins-a52 in Fedora 8?
  • From: Justin
• Re: Ada packages
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Ada packages
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Ada packages
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• GGZ Draft guideline
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Ada packages
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Ada packages
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Ada packages
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: python-svn build failed on koji
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: python-svn build failed on koji
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: python-svn build failed on koji
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• python-svn build failed on koji
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: speech-dispatcher packages
  • From: Hemant Goyal
• speech-dispatcher packages
  • From: Hemant Goyal
• [Fwd: Re: Lisp packaging draft]
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: rpc service description headers packaging
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• rpc service description headers packaging
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: pike packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• pike packages
  • From: josef radinger
• Re: help on PreReq and trigges for texinfo
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• help on PreReq and trigges for texinfo
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Mary Ellen Foster
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Conditionally building a sub-package?
  • From: James Laska
• Re: Reviewing an existing package with major changes
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Conditionally building a sub-package?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Reviewing an existing package with major changes
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Reviewing an existing package with major changes
  • From: Bruno Postle
• Conditionally building a sub-package?
  • From: James Laska
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Lisp packaging draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Lisp packaging draft
  • From: Anthony Green
• Re: Possible restructuring of docbook-related packages?
  • From: Robert P. J. Day
• Re: Possible restructuring of docbook-related packages?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Possible restructuring of docbook-related packages?
  • From: Robert P. J. Day
• Re: bootstrapping for scala
  • From: Geoff Reedy
• Re: bootstrapping for scala
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• bootstrapping for scala
  • From: Geoff Reedy
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Michał Bentkowski
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Michał Bentkowski
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: tex/latex doc install location
  • From: José Matos
• tex/latex doc install location
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Casey Dahlin
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Till Maas
• Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  • From: Karsten Hopp
• Package for python-svn (was pysvn)
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: naming of "documentation-devel" package
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• naming of "documentation-devel" package
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Package for pysvn
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Re: Package for pysvn
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Package for pysvn
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Proposal: Eclipse Plugins Guidelines
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Proposal: Eclipse Plugins Guidelines
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Proposal: Eclipse Plugins Guidelines
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Re: Package for pysvn
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: Package for pysvn
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Automatic detection of Requires and versions
  • From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: Services enabled by default when installed
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Services enabled by default when installed
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Services enabled by default when installed
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: Package for pysvn
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Package for pysvn
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Rex Dieter
• release of subpackage with version different from main rpm
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
  • From: Marek Mahut
• Re: Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Executable "Source:"es
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Executable "Source:"es
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Executable "Source:"es
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Package content question
  • From: Richard Fearn
• Re: Package content question
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Package content question
  • From: Richard Fearn
• Re: Correct name for php-pdb package?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Correct name for php-pdb package?
  • From: Richard Fearn
• Re: Procedures question
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Procedures question
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Next FPC meeting: 2008-01-08?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Next FPC meeting: 2008-01-08?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Next FPC meeting: 2008-01-08?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
  • From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• Re: Python Eggs addition: example%files
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Python Eggs addition: example%files
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Python Eggs addition: example%files
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Best way of patching sources for changed libbeagle?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Heads up: tomcat6 package into Fedora 9
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Best way of patching sources for changed libbeagle?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Best way of patching sources for changed libbeagle?
  • From: Sebastian Vahl
• Best way of patching sources for changed libbeagle?
  • From: Sebastian Vahl
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Wrong use of Backslash in Packaging Guidelines (libexecdir)
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Wrong use of Backslash in Packaging Guidelines (libexecdir)
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: [Long] Do we need a font SIG ?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: [Long] Do we need a font SIG ?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Reviewer needed (difficulty: easy!)
  • From: Michel Salim
• Reminder of meeting
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Unfinished business from last week's meeting
  • From: David Lutterkort
• Re: Unfinished business from last week's meeting
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Unfinished business from last week's meeting
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Unfinished business from last week's meeting
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fonts SIG packaging policies validation
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Dan Young
• Re: ltsp root directory
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• ltsp root directory
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Metapackage guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: [Fedora-fonts-list] Re: Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: server provides packaging draft
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: server provides packaging draft
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Fonts spec template validation
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ed Hill
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ed Hill
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• server provides packaging draft
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Tobias Burnus
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: François-Xavier Coudert
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Steve Kargl
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ed Hill
• Re: virtual provides for local servers
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: virtual provides for local servers
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: virtual provides for local servers
  • From: Jesse Keating
• virtual provides for local servers
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Marek Mahut
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: fortran .mod files
  • From: Marek Mahut
• fortran .mod files
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: rpmlint: W: strange-permission foo.init 0755
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• rpmlint: W: strange-permission foo.init 0755
  • From: Stepan Kasal
• Re: Octave package standard
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Octave package standard
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• packaging of Atari emulators
  • From: Dan Horák
• missing today's meeting
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Octave package standard
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Octave package standard
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: error on DistTag wiki page?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: error on DistTag wiki page?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• error on DistTag wiki page?
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: Octave package standard
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Octave package standard
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: rpmdevtools required for rebuilding packages on F7
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: rpmdevtools required for rebuilding packages on F7
  • From: Marcin Zajączkowski
• Re: rpmdevtools required for rebuilding packages on F7
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• rpmdevtools required for rebuilding packages on F7
  • From: Marcin Zajączkowski
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Apologize for missing the meeting
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: fonts packages requiring fontconfig
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: fonts packages requiring fontconfig
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: tex related packages naming
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• tex related packages naming
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Apologize for missing the meeting
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: small typo on Packaging/SourceURL
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Fonts section needs to mention Buildrequires
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Fonts section needs to mention Buildrequires
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Fonts section needs to mention Buildrequires
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets, fonts section: no "|| :" at the end of the fc-cache call?
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Unable to attend meeting on 9/18
  • From: David Lutterkort
• Re: Alpine
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Alpine
  • From: Jeremy Sanders
• Re: Need help packaging proftpd
  • From: Philip Prindeville
• Re: Need help packaging proftpd
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Fonts section needs to mention Buildrequires
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• small typo on Packaging/SourceURL
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Python Egg Draft 3
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Need help packaging proftpd
  • From: Philip Prindeville
• Re: Python Egg Draft 3
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Python Egg Draft 3
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python Egg Draft 3
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Python Egg Draft 3
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• missing FPC meeting today
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Python Eggs Draft 2
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Guidelines for packaging PHP addon modules (draft => official)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Guidelines for packaging PHP addon modules (draft => official)
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Review Guidelines simplifications
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Use of conflicts in package splitups
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Packaging/NamingGuidelines python modules naming
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Use of conflicts in package splitups
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Use of conflicts in package splitups
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Use of conflicts in package splitups
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Use of conflicts in package splitups
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts
  • From: Harald Hoyer
• Re: Firmware licensing
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Firmware licensing
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: broken wiki syntax on Packaging/ReviewGuidelines,
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• broken wiki syntax on Packaging/ReviewGuidelines,
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: sponsorship needed for reviewes / fedorabugs membership
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: sponsorship needed for reviewes / fedorabugs membership
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: sponsorship needed for reviewes / fedorabugs membership
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: sponsorship needed for reviewes / fedorabugs membership
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• sponsorship needed for reviewes / fedorabugs membership
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: kernel mod package howto?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kernel mod package howto?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets, fonts section: no "|| :" at the end of the fc-cache call?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: kernel mod package howto?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kernel mod package howto?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: kernel mod package howto?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kernel mod package howto?
  • From: Till Maas
• kernel mod package howto?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Prefix packages written in C/C++ with C-, CXX- (was: tex related packages names)
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets, fonts section: no "|| :" at the end of the fc-cache call?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets, fonts section: no "|| :" at the end of the fc-cache call?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Packaging/ScriptletSnippets, fonts section: no "|| :" at the end of the fc-cache call?
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Prefix packages written in C/C++ with C-, CXX- (was: tex related packages names)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts
  • From: Harald Hoyer
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Packaging Draft LSB Initscripts
  • From: Harald Hoyer
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: José Matos
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: José Matos
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: tex related packages names
  • From: José Matos
• tex related packages names
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Zope Public License
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Zope Public License
  • From: Paul Howarth
• sendmail license
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Packaging/ScriptletSnippets, fonts section: no "|| :" at the end of the fc-cache call?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Python Egg Guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• overview of all Package Guidelines or use CategoryPackageGuidelines
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Wiki is inconsistent on Mono file locations
  • From: Mary Ellen Foster
• Re: Wiki is inconsistent on Mono file locations
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Wiki is inconsistent on Mono file locations
  • From: Mary Ellen Foster
• Re: commands under privileged users' path
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: commands under privileged users' path
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• commands under privileged users' path
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Stepan Kasal
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Re: why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Stepan Kasal
• Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Stepan Kasal
• Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Stepan Kasal
• Re: Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Are circular dependencies ok?
  • From: Stepan Kasal
• Re: fc-cache <fontdir>
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Re: why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Jens Petersen
• review guidelines vs packaging guidelines
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Missing the meeting today
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Missing today's meeting
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Packaging/Guidelines -> Tags: missing link to the new License Tag Guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Packaging/Guidelines -> Tags: missing link to the new License Tag Guidelines
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Packaging/Guidelines -> Tags: missing link to the new License Tag Guidelines
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: missing file in example in sourceUrl
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• missing file in example in sourceUrl
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Re: New db4 update and package changes
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: New db4 update and package changes
  • From: Axel Thimm
• New db4 update and package changes
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: multiple changlog entries for one e-v-r
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: multiple changlog entries for one e-v-r
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Licensing guidelines suggestions
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Missing this (and maybe next) week's meeting
  • From: David Lutterkort
• Missing this (and maybe next) week's meeting
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Package EOL procedure when merging two packages
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: Package EOL procedure when merging two packages
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Package EOL procedure when merging two packages
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Package EOL procedure when merging two packages
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: multiple changlog entries for one e-v-r
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: multiple changlog entries for one e-v-r
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: multiple changlog entries for one e-v-r
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• multiple changlog entries for one e-v-r
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Re: scrollkeeper snippets
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: scrollkeeper snippets
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: scrollkeeper snippets
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: scrollkeeper snippets
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: scrollkeeper snippets
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• scrollkeeper snippets
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Missing most meetings until mid-September
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: rpmlint check for proper %defattr?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: rpmlint check for proper %defattr?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: rpmlint check for proper %defattr?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: rpmlint check for proper %defattr?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• rpmlint check for proper %defattr?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: License Tag Draft: Revised
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft: Revised
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• License Tag Draft: Revised
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Please Update Packaging/RPMMacros to mention lib64
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Please Update Packaging/RPMMacros to mention lib64
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Please Update Packaging/RPMMacros to mention lib64
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Please Update Packaging/RPMMacros to mention lib64
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: License Tag Draft
  • From: Till Maas
• License Tag Draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Users and groups -- the static alternative
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: kmod-madwifi
  • From: Adam Ornat
• Re: kmod-madwifi
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• kmod-madwifi
  • From: Adam Ornat
• Re: Duplicate pacakges question
  • From: Russell Harrison
• Duplicate pacakges question
  • From: Adam Ornat
• Missing the meeting today
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Absent from meeting today
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Absent from meeting today
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: rpm installation tests / script tests
  • From: Rex Dieter
• build ID -debuginfo rpm convention
  • From: Roland McGrath
• Mising today's meeting
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: build ID -debuginfo rpm convention
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: build ID -debuginfo rpm convention
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Axel Thimm
• build ID -debuginfo rpm convention
  • From: Roland McGrath
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Joe Orton
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• Re: [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Jesse Keating
• [Vote] Multiple version naming overly restrictive
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Multiple version naming overly restrictive?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Meeting today
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• smp_flags considered dangerous?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Multiple version naming overly restrictive?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Rpm-maint] Re: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?
  • From: Paul Nasrat
• Re: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ %doc?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: /srv
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: /srv
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: /srv
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: /srv
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: /srv
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: /srv
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: /srv
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: cmake guideline update proposal
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: /srv
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: cmake guideline update proposal
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: /srv
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot