On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:17:44PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > How about removing the prefix completely? Package description should be > sufficient to figure out it ships a TeX related stuff and we don't have many of > them currently. I see the only purpose of the prefix to avoid conficts with > already existing packages, in that case (la)tex-* or suffix *-(la)tex is ok IMO. You'd have my vote for that. I find the overprefixing a bit silly - next we'll have C-glibc. Prefixing should be used for resolving ambiguous situations, not as a replacement for the Groups: tag. Oh yes, the subject is just to catch reading eyes. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp5ZadEZPNhV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
