Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 06:42:03 -0800 > Brad Bell <bradbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I would like to understand a special case with respect to the CLA. It >> is the case where the Fedora packager is also the copyright holder >> for the package being contributed. >> >> I am the original author and copyright holder for a package. That >> package is currently distributed with the GPLv2 license. If I sign >> the CLA and complete the package contribution, does this mean that >> the original upstream source would no longer covered by the GPLv2 >> license, but rather by the CLA ? > > No. The CLA does not and cannot alter the licensing of any work > brought to Fedora. It is purely for the work done for Fedora by Fedora > contributors, such as wiki entries, spec files (that aren't otherwise > provided/licensed via upstream), documentation, etc... What about patches? Is it under CLA or/and under package license? -- Marek Mahut https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy/ Fedora Project http://www.jamendo.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
