On Friday 07 September 2007, Till Maas wrote: > On Do September 6 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and > > perhaps add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just me. > > Is doing it the other way round not good enough? > > Name: fuse-python > Provides: python-fuse = VR Good enough for whom? Both of those definitely satisfy the current naming guidelines, but personally in cases like this I always go for "if it's bar for foo, or bar used from foo or the like, its Name: is foo-bar", ie this one would become python-fuse (assuming I guess correctly what the package contains). -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
