On Thursday 06 September 2007, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:32 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > Aloas, > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce65 > >2c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d > > > > states: > > | There is an exception to this rule. If the upstream source has "py" > > | (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package. > > > > Maybe there should be another exception when upstream includes python it > > its name, e.g. fuse-python[1]. Should this be packaged as python-fuse or > > can it stay with upstream's name fuse-python? Should it provide > > python-fuse in case it stays with its upstream name? > > Does fuse-python have "py" in its name? If so, you can use that name for > the package. ;) I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and perhaps add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just me. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
