-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thursday 06 September 2007, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:32 +0200, Till Maas wrote: >>> Aloas, >>> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce65 >>> 2c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d >>> >>> states: >>> | There is an exception to this rule. If the upstream source has "py" >>> | (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package. >>> >>> Maybe there should be another exception when upstream includes python it >>> its name, e.g. fuse-python[1]. Should this be packaged as python-fuse or >>> can it stay with upstream's name fuse-python? Should it provide >>> python-fuse in case it stays with its upstream name? >> Does fuse-python have "py" in its name? If so, you can use that name for >> the package. ;) > > I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and perhaps > add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just me. > +1 In fact, I remember discussing removing the "py in the name" exception at one of the meetings. Might not have come to a vote, though. - -Toshio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG4DncX6yAic2E7kgRAkX7AKCZ3kLAQY8BjeW4mezi50vKRgE5dQCcCPed tQQRIEWdnye2WfJtVLju2uE= =zw9B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
