On 7/27/07, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:26 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On 7/27/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > # For a breakdown of the licensing, see PACKAGE-LICENSING > > > > Actual would it be possible that we cut down the syntax to the following: > > > > License: see PACKAGE-LICENSING > > A downside of keeping all the information in a separate file is that it > doesn't end up in the metadata and so you have to explode out packages > to get at it. > Well for most single license systems, i could see License: GPLv2 see PACKAGE-LICENSING for more information License: Complicated see PACKAGE-LICENSING for more information License: Frickin' Complicated see PACKAGE-LICENSING for more information License: Spot Died For This Package see PACKAGE-LICENSING for more information With that having the gory bits. The problem I see is that for these side cases.. you are ending up with -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
