On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:04:13 +0200 Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:07:18AM -0400, Ed Hill wrote:
> >
> > So are we reaching a consensus here on
> > "%{_libdir}/gfortran/modules"? Does anyone have any technical
> > objections to it?
>
> Somebody from the gfortran team told that they were dependent on the
> compiler version. Do we take that into account?
Hi Patrice,
Here is the latest from the GCC gfortran developers:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-10/msg00324.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-10/msg00325.html
Since there is no guarantee, it is (at least in theory) possible for a
Fedora GCC update to cause *.mod file incompatibilities. It seems
rather unlikely, though.
Maybe this issue could be best handled as a check-list item when GCC
updates occur? There are only a small number of Fedora packages that
provide *.mod files. And they could be re-built whenever GCC is
updated.
What do you think?
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD | ed@xxxxxxx | http://eh3.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
