Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue January 15 2008, Till Maas wrote: > > On Tue January 15 2008, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > > I agree with the /usr/bin/vim stuff, but I think a better solution would > > > be to add a conflict between vim-X11 and vim-enhanced. vim-enhanced is > > > only of use on systems without X11/gtk. On all other systems vim-X11 can > > > provide the same (and more) functionality as vim-enhanced. > > > > Ah, the only possible problem I can think of would be that an "update" from > > vim-enhanced to vim-X11 may not be possible. It should be possbile to do > > Using alternatives would make it easier for users in another case, too. When > someone wants to remove X11 from a default Fedora install ans still keep his > favourite editor. Then one could install both vim-X11 and vim-enhanced and > after removing X11, vim-enhanced would be still there. Define 'X11'. You can remove the servers just fine. Bill -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
