On Tue January 15 2008, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue January 15 2008, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > I agree with the /usr/bin/vim stuff, but I think a better solution would > > be to add a conflict between vim-X11 and vim-enhanced. vim-enhanced is > > only of use on systems without X11/gtk. On all other systems vim-X11 can > > provide the same (and more) functionality as vim-enhanced. > > Ah, the only possible problem I can think of would be that an "update" from > vim-enhanced to vim-X11 may not be possible. It should be possbile to do Using alternatives would make it easier for users in another case, too. When someone wants to remove X11 from a default Fedora install ans still keep his favourite editor. Then one could install both vim-X11 and vim-enhanced and after removing X11, vim-enhanced would be still there. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
