On Tue January 15 2008, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Tue January 15 2008, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Tue January 15 2008, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > > > I agree with the /usr/bin/vim stuff, but I think a better solution > > > > would be to add a conflict between vim-X11 and vim-enhanced. > > > > vim-enhanced is only of use on systems without X11/gtk. On all other > > > > systems vim-X11 can provide the same (and more) functionality as > > > > vim-enhanced. > > > > > > Ah, the only possible problem I can think of would be that an "update" > > > from vim-enhanced to vim-X11 may not be possible. It should be possbile > > > to do > > > > Using alternatives would make it easier for users in another case, too. > > When someone wants to remove X11 from a default Fedora install ans still > > keep his favourite editor. Then one could install both vim-X11 and > > vim-enhanced and after removing X11, vim-enhanced would be still there. > > Define 'X11'. You can remove the servers just fine. The X11 that gives the vim-X11 package its name. To be more precise, I meant with X11 every package that provides a requirement for vim-X11, that vim-enhanced does not have. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
