Till Maas (opensource@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Define 'X11'. You can remove the servers just fine. > > The X11 that gives the vim-X11 package its name. To be more precise, I meant > with X11 every package that provides a requirement for vim-X11, that > vim-enhanced does not have. I just don't see what having a separate package *just* for that gains you, especially with the complicated lengths suggested in this thread to maintain it? (alternatives is never the answer...) Bill -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
