On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 20:31 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > OK, I know this is going to be painful, but we need to solve this (FESCo > > is waiting for us to do it), and I think this is the cleanest way: > > > > Please review: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LicenseTag > > and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing . > > For versioning, I prefer the much shorter 'GPLv2' (GPL version 2 only) > and 'GPLv2+' (GPL version 2 or later). I'm not opposed to that. > I think the tagging per file in comments is definitely overkill. Again, most packages won't need this, its only in the case of packages with multiple files that are under different licenses. We're talking less than 1% of packages in Fedora. (Note that documentation licensing doesn't trigger this, nor would differing content licensing in the same package). ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
