On Wednesday 27 June 2007 15:23:27 Axel Thimm wrote: > /srv is already in various FHS-compliant use on thousands of > sites. You can't touch it really. And if you were to create a > /vendor-default-and-examples/srv then you can use /var/lib/foo as > well. > > In fact many "data carrying" applications like name servers, MTAs > etc. use /var in the FHS, although technically they would have to move > that content to /srv, by /srv's definition. I think the key thing here is that the FHS seems contradictory with regard to /srv and we really would like some clarification so that we can create appropriate packaging guidelines. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpZXiH6wU3lk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
