Le mercredi 27 juin 2007 à 20:52 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:41:43PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > You have file resources, and you have local network policies (which may > > even be dynamic with dhcp avahi & friends). They never map 1:1. Forcing > > file layout to reflect domain layout is an exercise in futility. > > I agree, which is why you can't this all happen under /srv. No. That means you partition /srv in an rpm-controlled part, and a free-for-all part. This way you can have sane pre-configured defaults, and people can do something else if they really want to. The current habit of shunning /srv at all costs results in: — defaults not being pre-configured & installed because the sane place to put them is blacklisted — or defaults that can not serve as examples (because their layout has no relation with the /srv/ users are supposed to use), confuse scripts (again because of the layout mismatch), confuse security policies, etc You can have a /srv/default and a /srv/local, or a /srv and /local/srv, or whatever but two totally different policies is just shooting ourselves in the foot. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
