On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:08:50PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mercredi 27 juin 2007 à 21:01 +0300, Ville Skyttä a écrit : > > > I don't see how it would be possible to sanely satisfy all the "do not assume > > any particular layout", "do not remove locally placed files in /srv" > > and "use /srv as the default location for such data" requirements in packaged > > software, so maybe that's a case in point for not using /srv at all. Yes, only "filesystem" should mention /srv, e.g. create it. > +1 > > also layouts that use domains as roots are pretty much ruled out in an > rpm context, so that's not as if we have a choice to make Yes, but that means more that the rpm setup within /srv is ruled out, the way you write it may be read as "rpm doesn't support domain hierarchies, so Fedora setups should not use them" ;) /srv was really left alone for several Fedora Core releases (only bittorrent would install there), we should return to that setup (and also move bittorrent away). $ ls /srv alsa-project.org atrpms.net bittorrent ivtvdriver.org lm-sensors.org medley mythdora video4linux.org -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpqI41hipGr9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
