On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:41:36PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Wednesday 27 June 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > /srv was really left alone for several Fedora Core releases (only > > bittorrent would install there), we should return to that setup (and > > also move bittorrent away). > > Moving is tricky for many packages as there can be *lots* of content installed > in the currently used dirs. It may and will in many cases require > reorganizing partitions and/or disks. True, I don't know how bittorrent's upgrading currently works, but with moving I ment new package installs. As long as there is only bittorrent and maybe a couple more packages polluting /srv we can have package-local workarounds phasing the direct usage under /srv out. For bittorrent this means that on new installs it picks the non-srv location and on upgrades it copies over the bittorent data location from the previous setup (probably needs to happen in %pre before the config files are overwritten). Or maybe bittorrent needs another approach, just giving the idea. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpQT1uEOqdRq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging