Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:33:53 -0500 > Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Um, but if <foo>-libs Requires: foo , wouldn't that pull foo into the >> multilib mix too, no? Am I missing something? > > No, as "foo" is arch independent. The idea here is that foo-devel has > a .so symlink that points to an arch specific library. So a -devel's Requires: %{name} ... is treated differently (is arch specific) than a -libs's Requires: %{name} ... (which isn't?) or is there some implicit requires in -devel's lib*.so symlink (which doesn't show in 'rpm --requires' or 'rpm --provides')? -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging