>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: JK> How should this be handled when one new package depends on another JK> new package, both going through review at the same time? Indeed, this would needlessly complicate reviews which depend on one another. It's bad enough as it is because it takes ages for the packages to actually get through the system, but at least without a "builds in koji" requirement the reviewer can put things in a local repo and get their end of the process done. Now, sure, it would be nice if everyone tested in koji or local mock whenever possible, so it's certainly worth talking about getting some recommendations into the guidelines. It would also be nice if they posted rpmlint output from the resulting packages and explained all of the issues present. I fear that something like this is going to be required if the review process is ever going to actually work properly and we're not going to suddenly see ten times as many people reviewing packages. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
