Re: Automatic detection of Requires and versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:58:23AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: 
> > If something is added between 2.8 and 2.10 while ABI is kept compatible 
> > and the soname isn't changed, and that new thing is needed, then the 
> > soname is not enough.
> 
> Only in the case when you're running something built against, say
> Fedora 8, on Fedora < 8. (Or Fedora 8 from some number of months
> ago, I suppose, if people are gratuitously upgrading libraries.)

Indeed. But the point is that sometime sonames are not enough.

Now it is up to the packager, he may consider that there is no need of 
the versionned requires because there is no such lib in relevant and 
maintained fedora/EPEL distros or there is such lib, but also an updated
version and people are supposed to be uptodate.

--
Pat

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux