On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:43 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 04:20:54PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:15 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > > > I'd say the reverse than Rex, include the Require manually. But I may > > > well be wrong. > > > > Well, you are. If an upstream has its package properly designed (Esp. > > uses SONAMEs properly), then there should not be any need to let a > > run-time/application-package explicitly require a package by name. > > Unless I am wrong, the sonames of 2.8 nad 2.10 are the same, but above > 2.10 is needed. If the SONAMEs are the same, the libraries MUST be compatible. => No need for a package dep. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
