On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 11:26 +1000, Jens Petersen wrote: > Hi, > > A package named "documentation-devel" has been submitted for review to > Fedora recently: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 > > It provides a comprehensive set of tools used by the Red Hat Docs team > and some others to build documentation written in docbook and its > translations into various formats. > > The question is can we keep the name as is, since they are not keen on > changing it, or should the name of the package be changed? My 0.02€: Formally, wrt. the FPC, there is nothing wrong with this name, ... The upstream package name choice is very unfortunate and raises false associations/confusion on the users' side. It should be changed do something more descriptive. If I were reviewing this package, I would not accept this package. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
