On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Should files under %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html be marked as %doc? They are
> API docs for libraries which are extracted using the gtk-doc toolset and
> viewable in devhelp. I've never seen a set of files that was necessary
> for the runtime operation of a library (and doubt that I will... they're
> API docs and usually included in a -devel subpackage.) On my current
> system I haven't found any files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html that are
> marked as %doc.
They should be considered %doc, yes. But the right way to do so is to
get it added to the list of docDirs within rpm. Attached patch should
do it.
Jeremy
diff -r 7ca081cd83d8 build/files.c
--- a/build/files.c Thu Jun 28 14:44:48 2007 +0300
+++ b/build/files.c Thu Jun 28 22:07:13 2007 -0400
@@ -2029,6 +2029,7 @@ static int processPackageFiles(Spec spec
fl.docDirs[fl.docDirCount++] = xstrdup("/usr/share/doc");
fl.docDirs[fl.docDirCount++] = xstrdup("/usr/share/man");
fl.docDirs[fl.docDirCount++] = xstrdup("/usr/share/info");
+ fl.docDirs[fl.docDirCount++] = xstrdup("/usr/share/gtk-doc/html");
fl.docDirs[fl.docDirCount++] = rpmGetPath("%{_docdir}", NULL);
fl.docDirs[fl.docDirCount++] = rpmGetPath("%{_mandir}", NULL);
fl.docDirs[fl.docDirCount++] = rpmGetPath("%{_infodir}", NULL);
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
