On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 22:08 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Should files under %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html be marked as %doc? They are
> > API docs for libraries which are extracted using the gtk-doc toolset and
> > viewable in devhelp. I've never seen a set of files that was necessary
> > for the runtime operation of a library (and doubt that I will... they're
> > API docs and usually included in a -devel subpackage.) On my current
> > system I haven't found any files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html that are
> > marked as %doc.
>
> They should be considered %doc, yes. But the right way to do so is to
> get it added to the list of docDirs within rpm. Attached patch should
> do it.
>
Great! Are you sending this on or should I open a bug against rpm?
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
