On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 19:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 22:08 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Should files under %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html be marked as %doc? They are
> > > API docs for libraries which are extracted using the gtk-doc toolset and
> > > viewable in devhelp. I've never seen a set of files that was necessary
> > > for the runtime operation of a library (and doubt that I will... they're
> > > API docs and usually included in a -devel subpackage.) On my current
> > > system I haven't found any files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html that are
> > > marked as %doc.
> >
> > They should be considered %doc, yes. But the right way to do so is to
> > get it added to the list of docDirs within rpm. Attached patch should
> > do it.
> >
> Great! Are you sending this on or should I open a bug against rpm?
That mail was cc'd to rpm-maint. So I'll get it pushed through
Jeremy
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
