On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 12:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > (Trying to add some constructive criticism now...) > > I think it would be good if we could ensure that the list of "approved" > licenses and their official abbreviations would be in sync with what > rpmlint considered valid licenses before this is put in place. Even > better if rpmlint had knowledge of the new, machine-readable, license > tag syntax and could validate that, too. Agreed. I can work on that. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging