Re: License Tag Draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 20:50 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > I think the tagging per file in comments is definitely overkill.
> > 
> > Most packages won't need it, and for those that do, it will make the
> > task for whomever is auditing the package (re: me) much simpler.
> 
> 73 packages that I have installed have some sort of multiple licensing.

?? 90% of all perl packages are multiple licensed.
These alone make several 100s of packages.

Not worth mentioning KDE/Qt which typically are licensed GPL*+QPL.

Also I am still missing a detailed list of all tags you want to force us
to use for BSD*ish, X11*ish and other licenses 

Ralf

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux