On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 06:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 20:50 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > I think the tagging per file in comments is definitely overkill. > > > > > > Most packages won't need it, and for those that do, it will make the > > > task for whomever is auditing the package (re: me) much simpler. > > > > 73 packages that I have installed have some sort of multiple licensing. > > ?? 90% of all perl packages are multiple licensed. > These alone make several 100s of packages. 90% of perl packages are _dual_ licensed, and thus, wouldn't need to do this. > Not worth mentioning KDE/Qt which typically are licensed GPL*+QPL. > > Also I am still missing a detailed list of all tags you want to force us > to use for BSD*ish, X11*ish and other licenses These aren't licenses. Either it is BSD or X11 or it is something else. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
