Jesse Keating wrote: >> or is there some implicit requires in -devel's lib*.so symlink (which >> doesn't show in 'rpm --requires' or 'rpm --provides')? > > It's a require that is generated at build time by following where > the .so symlink points to and requiring that library file. > > $ rpm -qp > --requires > /srv/pungi/dev21.3/7.90/Fedora/i386/os/Fedora/lockdev-devel-1.0.1-11.fc7.i386.rpm > warning: > /srv/pungi/dev21.3/7.90/Fedora/i386/os/Fedora/lockdev-devel-1.0.1-11.fc7.i386.rpm: > Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 liblockdev.so.1 <snip> > > $ rpm -qp > --requires /srv/pungi/cache/lockdev-devel-1.0.1-11.fc7.x86_64.rpm > warning: /srv/pungi/cache/lockdev-devel-1.0.1-11.fc7.x86_64.rpm: Header > V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2 > liblockdev.so.1()(64bit) > <snip> > > See how one is the non arch specific liblockdev.so.1 and the other is > arch specific? ockdev.so.1' and the only thing that provides that is > the i386 build. Likewise the only thing providing the > liblockdev.so.1()(64bit) is the x86_64 build of it. Thanks Jessie, I think I've got my brain wrapped around this now. -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
