On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 05:30:03AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 22:49 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:16:22AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > We have precedent (on a smaller scale) for this from the C world as well > > > with things like %{_libdir}/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h. > > > > > > After reading that these mod files are potentially compiler dependent as > > > well, using %{_libdir}/f90 and %{_libdir}/gfortran makes a lot of sense to > > > me. > > > > f90 is not a compiler. > f90 is a language dialect of fortran. It's compiler is gfortran. Could also be g95 (or any other f90 compiler). But is it reasonable to think about providing 2 compilers in fedora? -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging