On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 05:30:03AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 22:49 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:16:22AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > We have precedent (on a smaller scale) for this from the C world as well
> > > with things like %{_libdir}/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h.
> > >
> > > After reading that these mod files are potentially compiler dependent as
> > > well, using %{_libdir}/f90 and %{_libdir}/gfortran makes a lot of sense to
> > > me.
> >
> > f90 is not a compiler.
> f90 is a language dialect of fortran. It's compiler is gfortran.
Could also be g95 (or any other f90 compiler). But is it reasonable to
think about providing 2 compilers in fedora?
--
Pat
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
