On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 19:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > And what is the purpose of commenting licenses in the file list, apart > from making the packagers life miserable ? I agree. Or at least, I disagree with the example and scope in the Draft. I don't think we care what the license of an individual built program is. We might care what the license of a built library is. Whether it's better to mark libraries with a spec comment or make it mandatory to split libraries that are licensed differently from other code, I don't know, though. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
