On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 16:47 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 19:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > And what is the purpose of commenting licenses in the file list, apart > > from making the packagers life miserable ? > > I agree. Or at least, I disagree with the example and scope in the > Draft. I don't think we care what the license of an individual built > program is. We might care what the license of a built library is. > > Whether it's better to mark libraries with a spec comment or make it > mandatory to split libraries that are licensed differently from other > code, I don't know, though. > How would we know if there is a problem if program X links to lib Y if we don't have the licenses of both available. -sv -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
