On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:24:35PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > Technically, we're not really changing our stance here. > > If all of the packages putting aclocal bits are -devel packages, then it > should be ok to let automake own that directory, and have those -devel > packages depend on automake. If we've got non-devel packages doing this, I don't think every package shipping an autoconf macro should mandatorily depend in automake. It should be left to the packager. So if /usr/share/aclocal isn't owned by the filesystem package, packages have to own /usr/share/aclocal. -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
