Re: Should /usr/share/aclocal be in filesystem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 14:05 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 11:15 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Many packages dump their aclocal files in /usr/share/aclocal, but really 
> > don't need to require automake for normal usage.  Should all of these 
> > packages also own /usr/share/aclocal, or should it get moved to filesystem?
> 
> Seems like a decent idea to move to filesystem.
> 

Can we please not change our stance on this every other release ? 
I've added tons of Requires: automake for this exact reason. 
And it doesn't seem like a big burden for a devel package to require
automake. If we are not talking about devel packages, then that would be
the thing to fix...

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux