Le Jeu 23 août 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a écrit : > Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the guidelines > are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is impossible. I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time do they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be owned but there are exceptions". And then proceed with some examples where every directory is accounted for without explicitely stating this is a hard rule. I don't think the OP would have been so happy with the lax version if he had understood them to enforce this rule. IMHO since the documented "exceptions" are clearly targetted at perl modules, it would be better to create a perl-filesystem package and forget about all the complex A/B convolutions in the guidelines. But that's for the perl SIG to discuss. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
