On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 13:09 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Timothy Selivanow wrote: > > The way I interpreted the Package Naming Guidelines[1], the package I'm > > working on (pysvn) should be called python-svn. Is this not correct[2]? > > > > > > 1: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines > > 2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718#c11 > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce652c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d > > "There is an exception to this rule. If the upstream source has "py" (or > "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package. So, for > example, pygtk is acceptable." > > -- Rex Thanks! Somehow I missed that little blurb under the examples. pysvn also falls under the "how it is called" rule, as it is used as "import pysvn". So many documents... --Tim ____________________________________________________________________ / It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be \ | unhappy. | \ -- Groucho Marx / -------------------------------------------------------------------- \ \ \ \ /\ ( ) .( o ). -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
