Re: tex related packages naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: tex related packages naming
From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:06:44 +0300
In-reply-to: <46F45561.7070309@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070920221015.GC1456@xxxxxxx> <1190379561.3418.45.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46F45561.7070309@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Saturday 22 September 2007, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> +1 to making the prefix tex-

+1

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

References:
- tex related packages naming
  - From: Patrice Dumas
- Re: tex related packages naming
  - From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: tex related packages naming
  - From: Toshio Kuratomi

Prev by Date: Re: Re: rpmdevtools required for rebuilding packages on F7
Next by Date: Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
Previous by thread: Re: tex related packages naming
Next by thread: Re: tex related packages naming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux