-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 07:45 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:53:32PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >>> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 00:10 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Could it be possible for the packaging commitee to decide on that issue, >>>> please? The proposals are: >>>> >>>> * prefix with tex- >>>> * no specific naming. Prefix with tex- when another package has the same >>>> name >>>> >>>> Could it be possible to have a vote/decision on that issue? >>> Please pick one and propose it to us. (Or both, as they seem to work >>> well together). >> I can't propose one, since there are people that want one and other >> that want the other. I am asking for a ruling by the packaging >> commitee. > > Fair enough. I propose that we change the prefix from tetex- to tex-, > since these packages were prefixed before. > If email voting is sufficient for this, +1 to making the prefix tex- - -Toshio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG9FVhX6yAic2E7kgRApByAKCf3aAqqqEk1aMqmuXlRFe1xLCplgCfa1MP YHzK0+IvO6coB8JpJRTde9Y= =c13X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
