Re: tex related packages naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: tex related packages naming
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Sep 2007 10:24:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <46F45561.7070309@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070920221015.GC1456@xxxxxxx> <1190332412.3418.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070921054550.GB16823@xxxxxxx> <1190379561.3418.45.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46F45561.7070309@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4

>>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

TK> +1 to making the prefix tex-

+1 here as well.

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tex related packages naming
  - From: Jonathan Underwood

References:
- tex related packages naming
  - From: Patrice Dumas
- Re: tex related packages naming
  - From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: tex related packages naming
  - From: Patrice Dumas
- Re: tex related packages naming
  - From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: tex related packages naming
  - From: Toshio Kuratomi

Prev by Date: Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
Next by Date: Re: tex related packages naming
Previous by thread: Re: tex related packages naming
Next by thread: Re: tex related packages naming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux