On Thursday 30 August 2007, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > I also don't really like hardcoding "fdr" where "rh" was before... > > hardcoding? The point I believe is that if we want a separate function in the init script template to be invoked for the status action, plain "status" cannot be used because there already is a function by that name in /etc/init.d/functions so it needs to have some other name. A "fdr_" prefix is IMHO as good as anything but some people don't like it. One way to solve it would be just to invoke the "status" from /etc/init.d/functions in the "status" action case and ditch the current separate fdr_status function. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
