On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 10:04 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 15:05 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts says: > > > > | If you find yourself in a situation where you feel that your package has to > > | conflict with another package (either explicitly or implicitly), but does > > | not fit the documented accepted cases above, then you need to make your case > > | to the Fedora Packaging Committee. > > > > I guess here is such a case: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 > > > > knm_new-fonts was split up from fonts-japanese, therefore it conflicts with an > > older version for fonts-japanese. I have also two review requests (vbetool > > and radeontool), that are splitups from pm-utils, do they need to conflict > > with the old version of pm-utils, too? > > These sound like reasonable uses of conflicts to me Agreed, this is fine because you're explicitly conflicting with an older version of the package from whence these bits originally lived. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
