Jon Ciesla wrote:
I'm trying to get a .spec polished and checked in for the release of
proftpd-1.3.1, but I'm having a few issues with it.
If anyone has the time to offer some assistance, I'd appreciate it.
I'm not an RPM guru... I've skimmed Maximum RPM a couple of times a
year or two ago.
I just want to get a more recent build of proftpd into the Fedora distro
space, and the way to do that is with a proper .spec file in the source
tree.
Contact me offline if you can provide some comments/guidance.
Phillip, I tried, but I got. . .
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(reason: 554 mail.redfish-solutions.com ESMTP not accepting messages)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mail.redfish-solutions.com.:
<<< 554 mail.redfish-solutions.com ESMTP not accepting messages
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
Odd. Not sure why.
If it were my spam filters (they are rather aggressive), you would have
gotten a different message.
I'll look into it.
I'll post the .x86_64.rpm and the .src.rpm files onto
ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/ ... they should be there shortly
(within 15 minutes).
Wasn't sure if I should make "run from inetd (xinetd)" be the default or
not. Anyone have any strong preferences? Using xinetd doesn't add a
lot of overhead, except maybe on a very high volume site... and it does
allow the use of tcp-wrappers with no additional configuration (whereas
using mod_wrap.so in standalone mode requires a little more work).
-Philip
Thanks,
-Philip
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
