Re: "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running rawhide these days again and during yum update I quite often
> see messages like
> 
>>   Updating  : gedit                        ##################### [173/382] 
>> gconfd-2: no process killed
>>   Updating  : deskbar-applet               ##################### [174/382] 
>> gconfd-2: Kein Prozess abgebrochen
>>   Updating  : gnome-terminal               ##################### [175/382]
> 
> Looking closer at the spec and at the Gconf session on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets
> it seems they run
> 
> killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :
> 
> to make sure any running gconfd-2 pick up newly installed schemes. But
> well, as you can see from above output there might be cases when no
> gconfd-2 is running, thus killall will print a warning.
> 
> I think we should avoid such useless warnings -- thus it would seem
> better to me to use killall with "--quiet" or use
> 
> killall -HUP gconfd-2 2> /dev/null || :
> 
> instead. What do you guys think?
> 
This looks like a good change.  Anyone object to me going ahead and
changing it?

- -Toshio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG9JP5X6yAic2E7kgRAoCJAJ0d4x/I48DT4X/S01mT1u61gDKm3wCfQ6qO
FB3LTGHUeUbop4nXIOVpRAQ=
=33Sy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux