On Saturday 28 July 2007, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "VS" == Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> writes: > > VS> And the Java case is a good example of another problem - I'm not > VS> sure we'd want people to disable debuginfo packages because the > VS> tools don't support creating sane ones from them yet. > > Actually it's possible to fix the Java packages; you have to move the > source so that the scripts will find it. I've been through this on > pretty much all of the Java packages I reviewed. (It's been a while > since I did one, though.) I've also had to do this with some Perl > XS-built packages. Ah, good to know. If there's a common pattern how these files need to be moved around or how to generally find a way to do it, could you add some info about it to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo ? > I admit this is nasty, but I've been assuming that we really want > proper debuginfo when we can get it. Ditto. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
