On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 19:10 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fr September 7 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > I'm not sure I see the point of this. The package must be buildable on > > the Fedora Buildsystem anyway, to enter the package collection. Pointing > > out that koji can do scratch builds as an alternative to mock for > > testing buildability might be useful, tough. > > It simplifies the review guidelines. Instead of at least a demanded local > rpmbuild and optional builds for every architecture and in mock and verifying > the BuildRequires (either with rpmdev-rmdevelrpms or mock) only one step is > needed. The advantage is also that always building for every architecture ist > tested. I think that I would rather amend the Review Guidelines to state that a successful scratch build in koji is an acceptable alternative to a successful local build. Either is permissable to meet this criteria. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
