On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 22:03 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fr September 7 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Friday 07 September 2007, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Do September 6 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and > > > > perhaps add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just me. > > > > > > Is doing it the other way round not good enough? > > > > > > Name: fuse-python > > > Provides: python-fuse = VR > > > > Good enough for whom? Both of those definitely satisfy the current naming > > Good enough for a user, will there be any differences if one uses yum to > search for "fuse-python" or "python-fuse" or will both produce the same > result? I don't think that yum search looks through provides, but I could be wrong on that. Should be easy enough to test (run repoquery on the one package, point yum at the new "repo" and run a search). ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
