On 18/07/07, Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My suggestion is just to go with emacs-* rather than emacs-common-*. It is a pretty small change and already quite a number of older elisp packages follow it.
If I understand correctly, this would translate to: main package: emacs-foo, containing files specific to GNU Emacs sub package: emacs-foo-common, containing files not specific to any Emacs flavour sub-package: xemacs-foo, containing files specific to XEmacs sub-packages: xemacs-foo-el and emacs-foo-el containing the lisp source for each flavour. This is essentially was my very first original proposal, but people weren't keen on it as it uses the term emacs as a generalization for emacs flavours, and as a specific for GNU Emacs. I do happen to prefer this though, and tend to agree with Jens. If I recall, at least Tom didn't like it. J. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
