On 22/05/07, Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I still think the emacs-common prefix is confusing with the emacs-common package but I should have made that comment a year ago I guess. ;-) There are alternative prefix's (elisp or emacsen) that could be (have been) used but perhaps it is too late now? IMHO it would be better to avoid hyphened prefixes in package naming afap possible in the future.
Jens, you're of course right. The fact that emacs-common is a subpackage of emacs didn't come up during the discussions a year ago. I did try for "emacsen" but people didn't like that so much, am not sure why. Anyway, I'm happy to revisit the package naming guidelines for (X)Emacs add-ons, Jens seems inclined to do so. Does anyone else have strong feelings either way? Jonathan -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
