On 20/07/07, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If I understand correctly, this would translate to: main package: emacs-foo, containing files specific to GNU Emacs sub package: emacs-foo-common, containing files not specific to any Emacs flavour sub-package: xemacs-foo, containing files specific to XEmacs sub-packages: xemacs-foo-el and emacs-foo-el containing the lisp source for each flavour. This is essentially was my very first original proposal, but people weren't keen on it as it uses the term emacs as a generalization for emacs flavours, and as a specific for GNU Emacs.
I should also point out that the above proposal doesn't treat GNU Emacs and XEmacs on an equal footing - the XEmacs package being a sub package and the GNU Emacs package being the main package. The current emacs-common-foo scheme does not have that bias. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
